The
purpose of this website is to make public the correspondence
I have had with the Watchtower, Bible and Tract Society and
the subsequent ramifications therein. I make this information
publicly available for two reasons. The first reason is, as
one of Jehovah’s Witnesses, I was always instructed
to make the truth known.
Matthew 5:15 and 16 says: “People light a lamp and set
it, not under the measuring basket, but upon the lampstand,
and it shines upon all those in the house. Likewise let your
light shine before men…” And Mark 4:22 and 23
states: “There is nothing hidden except for the purpose
of being exposed; nothing has become carefully concealed but
for the purpose of coming into the open. Whoever has ears
to listen, let him listen…”
As an Organization that places the highest of value on the
bible, the Watchtower Society agrees with the above verses.
In their flagship periodical, the Watchtower, they
say: “Truthfulness means more than merely telling the
truth. It is a way of life. It defines who we are. We make
the truth known to others not only by what we say but also
by what we do. … If we are to impart truth to others,
we must be truthful in all our ways. Our reputation for truthfulness
and honesty will have a powerful impact on how people respond
to what we teach.” (01August2003, page 16)
The second reason that I make this information available is
due to the implicit approval I received from the Watchtower
Society to do so. In my most recent letter to them, I requested
answers (or at least references that would lead me to the
answers) to specific questions. I had asked questions of similar
import on prior occasions, and had not received answers. So,
in an effort to find some resolution, I asked them once again
to answer said questions. I told them that if no answer was
forthcoming, I would understand their silence to be taken
as a “Yes” answer to each and every question and,
further, would ensure that I share this “light”
(Matthew 5:16) with the many family and friends who have shared
these questions with me.
Although one of my relatives accused me of writing to the
Society in an effort to prove them wrong, this baseless accusation
is as far from the truth as can be. The correspondence originated
in late 1996. At that time, I was recently married. My wife
and I were zealous Witnesses donating 1,000 hours (yearly)
of our time by knocking on doors and teaching people about
the bible by placing Watchtower publications with them. The
year prior had been a tough year for me, and I was feeling
depressed – at a stand still, so to speak.
Then, in December 1996, a representative of the Watchtower
Society visited our congregation for a week. One evening,
he gave a talk regarding the importance of personal bible
study. He spoke mostly of the typical studying that Witnesses
are expected to do, such as reading the bible each week, preparing
for the weekly question-and-answer parts at the meetings and
reading the latest issues of the Watchtower’s periodicals.
While I agreed with all of this, I couldn’t help but
think of how little new information I was receiving by doing
such studying. I had read the bible several times, and I kept
up with the Watchtower Society’s publications. Still,
there wasn’t much new or exciting for me to learn. As
blasphemous as it sounded to me at the time, I already knew
all that stuff.
But then the representative made some very interesting comments.
He said: “Perhaps there are those of you in the audience
who are very studious and who are quite capable of keeping
up with the spiritual feeding program the Watchtower Society
provides. Maybe you faithfully attend meeting after meeting
and read book after book and find that you never learn anything
new.”
When he said this, my ears perked up. He was exactly defining
my situation, and I viewed this as God’s answer to my
prayers. I was eager to hear what he next said.
He offered this suggestion to persons like me: He said to
pick one subject from the bible, and make it our goal to learn
absolutely everything about that subject that we could. In
doing this, he assured us, the bible would once again come
alive to us, our faith would be strengthened and, as an added
benefit, we would become a valuable asset in our congregation
whenever that topic arose.
I began to contemplate the many bible topics at which I could
become an “expert”. Before I could decide on one
for myself, however, the overseer suggested Noah’s Flood
as one possible topic to explore.
And so that’s the topic I decided upon. Within weeks,
I had read everything the Watchtower Society had written in
the past 50 years about Noah and the Flood. My wife and I
pieced together graph paper in an attempt to get a handle
on the dimensions of the ark. We even visited a craft store
looking to buy supplies to construct our own scale-model of
the ark.
Eventually, I desired to figure out the animal passenger list
of the ark. I found the Watchtower Society’s information
on this subject somewhat wanting, so I wrote them my first
letter.
As an aside, I was also curious as to their use of the term
“land” when used in the yearly report of Witness
door-to-door activity. So I included a question about this
in the letter as well.
I was quite nervous to send the letter. I tried my best to
phrase the letter in such a way that the Watchtower Society
wouldn’t feel that I was questioning their authority
over God’s people, or their interpretation of the bible.
They make it quite clear that asking questions is a slippery
slope that can get a person into a lot of trouble.* My questions
were asked in sincerity, as I really, genuinely wanted to
know the answer and I really, genuinely wanted the biblical
account of Noah’s Flood to be accurately reflected in
the findings of geologists, biologists and historians. At
the time of the first letter, I fully believed that the bible
was the inspired word of God and that any contradiction between
the bible and scientific findings was due to a lack of complete
knowledge on the part of scientists or their willful decision
to ignore God.
All cited references are available in electronic or paper
form for interested persons.
*For
example, page 20 of the June 1, 1982 states:
The
proper spirit after offering suggestions is to be content
to leave the matter to the prayerful consideration of the
mature brothers directing the work in Jehovah's organization.
But if those making the suggestions are not content with that
and continue to dispute the subject in the congregations with
a view to getting others to support them, what then? That
would create divisions, and could subvert the faith of some.
And
page 31 of the April 1, 1986 Watchtower states:
Approved
association with Jehovah’s Witnesses requires accepting
the entire range of the true teachings of the Bible, including
those Scriptural beliefs that are unique to Jehovah’s
Witnesses.
And
page 22 of the January 15, 1983 Watchtower (in the article
“Avoid Independent Thinking”) states:
Avoid...questioning
the counsel that is provided by God's visible organization.